How We Compare
Walking MET ≈ 3.5; freestyle swimming MET ≈ 7.0; vigorous swimming ≈ 10.
Same formula: Calories = MET × kg × hours. Swimming's higher MET reflects arms + legs + core resistance.
Buoyancy removes ground-reaction force → no bone-density signal → walking retains that unique benefit.
Joint-friendliness
Swimming is the gold standard for joint-sensitive adults. Walking is close behind — safe for nearly everyone.
Bone density
Weight-bearing walking activates osteoblasts. Swimming does not — over decades this matters for hip and spine bone mineral density.
Practicality
Walking needs no facility, no learning curve, no gear. Swimming needs pool access and technique for efficient calorie burn.
Walking vs Swimming — 1 Hour
| Weight | Walk kcal | Swim freestyle | Swim vigorous |
|---|---|---|---|
| 55 kg | 193 | 385 | 550 |
| 70 kg | 245 | 490 | 700 |
| 85 kg | 298 | 595 | 850 |
| 100 kg | 350 | 700 | 1,000 |
MET 3.5 walking, 7.0 freestyle, 10 vigorous swimming.
How we calculate this (worked example)
Every figure on this page is produced by the same calculation engine as the calculator above — no hardcoded numbers. Here is the full arithmetic for 10,000 steps at 70 kg (154 lbs), moderate pace, flat ground.
- Distance: 10,000 steps × 0.74 m ÷ 1,000 = 7.40 km (4.60 miles)
- Walking time: 7.40 km ÷ 5 km/h × 60 = 1h 29m (89 minutes)
- Calories: 3.5 MET × 70 kg × 3.5 ÷ 200 × 89 min = 381 kcal
- Per step: 381 kcal ÷ 10,000 steps = 0.038 kcal per step
10,000 steps by body weight
| Body weight | Distance | Walking time | Calories burned |
|---|---|---|---|
| 55 kg (121 lbs) | 7.40 km (4.60 mi) | 1h 29m | 299 kcal |
| 70 kg (154 lbs) | 7.40 km (4.60 mi) | 1h 29m | 381 kcal |
| 85 kg (187 lbs) | 7.40 km (4.60 mi) | 1h 29m | 462 kcal |
| 100 kg (220 lbs) | 7.40 km (4.60 mi) | 1h 29m | 544 kcal |
Distance and time are identical across weights (7.4 km at 0.74 m stride) because only energy expenditure scales with body mass.
Definitions
- Step
- One single footfall. Two steps make one full stride cycle, so a pedometer counting 10,000 steps records 5,000 complete left-right cycles.
- Stride length
- The horizontal distance covered by one step, measured heel-to-heel. We use 0.74 m (2.43 ft) as the average adult value, or 0.415 × height in cm for men and 0.413 × height for women.
- Walking distance
- Steps × stride length. Distance in kilometres = (steps × stride in metres) ÷ 1,000; miles = kilometres × 0.621371.
- Calories burned
- Energy expenditure estimated with the MET equation: kcal = MET × weight (kg) × 3.5 ÷ 200 × minutes. Moderate walking at 5 km/h is MET 3.5.
- Walking time
- Distance ÷ walking speed. At the 5 km/h baseline, one kilometre takes 12 minutes and one mile takes about 19 minutes.
- Cadence
- Steps per minute. A moderate 5 km/h pace corresponds to roughly 100–110 steps per minute; brisk walking is 120+ steps per minute.
Assumptions and rounding rules
| Parameter | Default | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Stride length | 0.74 m (2.43 ft) | Average adult; overridden by your height or entered stride |
| Walking pace | 5 km/h (3.1 mph) | Moderate, flat ground; reduced 20% on hills and 30% on trails |
| MET value | 3.50 | Flat terrain, moderate fitness; +0.1 MET per 1% incline |
| Body weight | 70 kg (154 lbs) | Reference weight for examples; your input replaces it |
| Distance rounding | 2 decimals (km and miles) | Rounded for display only — full precision is used in the maths |
| Calorie rounding | Nearest whole kcal | Rounded at the last step, never mid-calculation |
| Step rounding | Nearest whole step | Reverse calculations round to the nearest integer step |
Limitations
- All results are estimates, not measurements. MET-based calorie models typically fall within ±10–20% of indirect calorimetry for an individual.
- Individual differences in gait efficiency, age, body composition and fitness change actual energy cost at the same speed.
- Terrain, surface softness, wind and altitude are only partly captured by the terrain and incline settings.
- Stride length varies with pace, footwear and fatigue; a single average stride cannot represent a whole walk.
- Pedometers and phone accelerometers miscount steps by roughly 5–15%, especially at slow speeds or when carried in a bag.
- Figures describe activity energy expenditure only and exclude resting metabolism, so they should not be subtracted twice from a daily budget.
Method: stride-based distance plus the MET equation from the Compendium of Physical Activities (Ainsworth et al.). Results are estimates — see our estimation disclaimer.
Key takeaway
Swimming per hour beats walking on pure calorie burn; walking wins on bone density, convenience, and step counts. Ideal: both.
Want your exact number?
Real-Life Scenarios
The arthritic walker
Swim 2×/week, walk 3×/week — spreads joint load across the whole week.
The 60+ adult
Walking wins on bone density. Add swimming for shoulder mobility and cross-training.
The weight-loss client
Swimming's per-hour burn is hard to beat if the pool is convenient. Adherence usually decides winner.
In summary: Swimming per hour beats walking on pure calorie burn; walking wins on bone density, convenience, and step counts. Ideal: both.